?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Every time I think I have it rough, I need to remind myself that of the two medEvacs I've seen in the last five days, I have not been actively involved in either, so things could be worse.  It was still tiresome to spend twenty minutes at a standstill on 95 this morning, though.

However, I am close to exhaustion, despite a reasonably smooth night last night (I only woke up about five times).  My eyes feel like I've been crying (I haven't, just so you all don't worry about me), and my arms - oh, my arms.

I have a car again.  Unfortunately, while it did have a dead battery, it also has a mostly broken clutch, but Bob and I drove to and from Goochland (about 3.5 hours each way) yesterday to pick it up so our local mechanic can work on it.  Driving down was nice, but driving back with a cranky clutch (I have to pump it to change gears) was tiring, to say the least.  My arms are singing "I hate you" at very high volume today.  But I have my car back, and I have things to do, people to kill.

I kid, I kid.  But Bob's birthday party is this weekend, and while most of the stuff is now in place, bought, and set up, I still need to get things like, oh, food.  And beer.  Beer is good.

But enough about that.  We have a garage!

 

 

That was all done in a week - we went from concrete slab (that was laid when the rest of the foundation was laid, so we've had it for a while) to "garage ready for siding" in a week.  The builders were amazing - fast, friendly, and really good.  The last picture is the upstairs in the garage, which will be my studio (and an extra spare room, since there's a bathroom/shower downstairs).  Very, very cool.  It's a two-car garage, which might be big enough for our bits and pieces, but we'll probably have to get a shed for the lawnmowers.

We also had visitors:

 

This pair of black vultures has been hanging around near the house (very near - the seated one was in one of the closest small black walnuts, and didn't move when we came out to look at it), and we hope they'll nest in the chicken coop - they were using it as a roost last year, but no eggs.  Hopefully they'll decide it's the perfect spot, and we'll have little fluffy (stinky) baby vultures again!

The flowers are also out - a bunch of them survived the construction:

 

There's nothing that says spring for me like daffodils.

Finally, the pictures you've all been waiting for - Froggy!

(A detailed explanation of the process will be going into the "Reproductions" section of my site on the next update, which should be happening in the next couple of months.)

pinkleader was kind enough to post the url of the original on Monday, but here it is again:  http://collectionsonline.lacma.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;id=96600;type=101

It is a needlecase from the early 17th century (which means it could date anywhere from 1580 to 1650, but probably no earlier than 1570), done in detached buttonhole stitch.

First thing, once I decided to make it, was to work out the pattern sizes.  I got as close to the original as I could in size, so it's roughly 2.5 by 3.5 inches.  I made a mock-up of the pattern, to check on the fit and length of the pieces:

 

Then started on the needlework.  It took longer than I originally anticipated (50 hours was my estimate, because I still haven't learned to increase all estimates by 30% or so right from the beginning), and I tracked various parts:



8.5 hours worth of work on one of the legs - this also shows how I did the stitching - couched onto waste fabric, then the couching threads are cut away.

The finished product:

 

And, since a needlecase needs a piece of wool for holding the actual needle (steel needles should be stored in wool, since the lanolin helps prevent rust - this is also why you never leave the needle in your embroidery), I added a little touch of my own:

 

The original does not have a tongue, as far as I know.  But I like my frog to have some attitude.

I really did just work from the one picture, but a lot was evident in that picture - the legs are wired to hold their shape, and the "paws" are completely detached.  I used a dupioni taffeta for the bag part, and the "body" is sewn to a piece of stiff paper with pasted-on silk (I think the original may have a wired edge, but I preferred to use the pasted paper, which is also a period method of creating a stiffened piece).  

I braided the cord ties, which are only on either side of the body pieces, and do not go under.  The gathering had to be measured so that when closed, the fabric bag does not stick out at the top, spoiling the "frog" shape.  

In all, I'm very pleased with it - not bad for 81 hours of sewing.

                                 
(A picture of the original, my mock-up, and my froggie, showing the sizes.  The picture of the original is very close to actual size.)

Comments

(Deleted comment)
attack_laurel
Mar. 26th, 2008 02:42 pm (UTC)
Re: little froggies
Thanks. :) The LACMA one is called a needlecase, so I'm going with their classification - I assume they've looked inside. :) It's so tiny - I should have taken a picture of him in my hand, so the scale is clearer.

I do recall the London frog, vaguely (at least, I remembered there was more than one) - I just couldn't find it. Is in the Museum of London? It's not in the V&A - they have the bunch of grapes version, but not a frog...
eithni
Mar. 26th, 2008 07:36 pm (UTC)
Re: little froggies
Yup. It is the Museum of London - I sent the link yesterday, but here it is again! http://tinyurl.com/3xfqle

Your little guy is adorable... Now where to find a several dozen spare hours lying about...
attack_laurel
Mar. 27th, 2008 09:47 am (UTC)
Re: little froggies
cool. Thanks!

Latest Month

April 2017
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com