You are viewing [info]attack_laurel's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Wreck the Halls

me and my vulture
I don't know what being in the holiday mood means to you, but for me, I always get a warm fuzzy feeling watching the world end. After a couple of days of relatives, there's nothing better than curling up on the sofa to watch zombies destroy the nation, especially if one of the victims that dies in a particularly gruesome way looks just a little bit like Uncle Ned, who won't stop making jokes about the size of your ass.

(In the event of a real zombie emergency, trip Uncle Ned and throw him in the path of the zombie horde. His enormous beer belly should keep them busy long enough for you to get away.)

As we all know, I'm big on horror movies. I'm also big on apocalypse movies. When the two coincide, I'm pretty darned happy. So, I liked I am Legend; it had monsters, pathos, and excellent scenery of a completely deserted New York. I enjoyed it tremendously, including the nods to its previous remake, Omega Man. The original movie (filmed as The Last Man on Earth) starred Vincent Price, and had actual vampires with an allergy to garlic. I don't recall much more; it's been years since I saw it. If you need more, look it up on www.imdb.com.

My favourite kind of apocalypse movies are the ones that show the apocalypse happening (I guess that rules out post-apocalypse movies then, doesn't it?). Like director Roland Emmerich (The Day After Tomorrow, Independence Day), I totally dig seeing nature/aliens/zombies wipe out civilization. Extra points if very large explosions are involved, and it goes to the top of my list if there's also a rather gross-looking virus/bacterium/alien spooge turning people into raw hamburger on legs.

Yes, I'm sick. But I'm also looking forward to the release of Alien vs. Predator: Requiem.   I'm not fussy about movies; if I want unrelenting intelligence, I'll read a book.  For me, movies just need 'splosions (YMMV).  There's something so fun about watching one's worst fears fulfilled.

There's also an amusing undercurrent of acquisivity in many last-person-on-earth movies; I think Dawn of the Dead (the original) said it most obviously.  Imagine getting an entire multiplex mall to yourself.  Sure, there are dead cannibals outside, but inside there's a gourmet food store, an ice rink, clothes, fun crap, and all the material goods you could ever want!  I enjoy this aspect of the movie; perhaps I'm not into zombies at all, but simply want to go on a giant shopping spree.

Nah.  It's the zombies.  Give me that old-time zombie action, baby.  Besides, short of a zombie invasion, Uncle Ned is never going to leave.

Comments

( 35 brains — Leave a chunk of brain! )
[info]kass_rants wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 11:22 am (UTC)
I am rolling! Your first two paragraphs can me laughing so hard I couldn't breathe. I am now blue. ;)
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 01:49 pm (UTC)
Uncle Ned deserved to be eaten. My ass is not big.
[info]spranglady wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 11:44 am (UTC)
You are a fantastically sick woman. :)
[info]bantiarna wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 11:58 am (UTC)
Glad to hear the positive review. I too am a fan of disaster movies. I like them on the small scale too, Towering Inferno, Poseidon.
We actually had to watch The Day After in school when I was growing up in an attempt to scare us all to death.

Good Times.
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 12:53 pm (UTC)
The Day After (which I watched with everyone else, but it has aged horribly when I watch it now) has nothing on an English version called Threads, which was unrelentingly depressing, and ended up with mutant babies being born to illiterate sub-normal IQ 13 year old mothers.

It's a laff riot. Not.
[info]janinas_nest wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 12:09 pm (UTC)
I'm not that fond of horror movies, but I agree the movies really need to Blow Sh*t Up. The more the better. If the plot can be described in three sentences, good. And I think this year's perfect Christmas movie is Sweeny Todd.
[info]amykb wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 12:19 pm (UTC)
Dawn of the Dead
I worked in that Mall (Monroeville Mall, just outside of Pittesburgh) :) Let me tell you, you can really freak yourself out in the back corridors while heading for your storage room.

Especially after hours.
[info]amykb wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 12:20 pm (UTC)
Re: Dawn of the Dead
Sorry, Pittsburgh--bad typing and a 5 yr old chattering too early in the morning.
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 12:54 pm (UTC)
Re: Dawn of the Dead
'sokay - I've seen the ads for the mall (they're on the extended DVD set Bob got me for Christmas last year), and I can imagine! You'll never look at Hare Krishnas the same after that movie. :)
[info]courtney_d_h wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 01:07 pm (UTC)
I am with you on the apocalyptic movies.. but not so much on the terror. I love wild "Weather-that-can't-truly-be-happening" movies.. and other disaster flicks. My husband couldn't figure me out since I shudder from horror flicks. What I *don't* like is the "springing out from under the bed/out of the closet/around the corner/down from the ceiling" make you shriek" kind of movies. We finally distinguished the difference by calling them terror versus horror. I can handle the occasional horror, but not terror. I have too many terrible thoughts and fears to just ADD to the mental vocabulary of possibilities. Even if they ARE just zombies! (lol)
[info]shalandara wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 02:05 pm (UTC)
I'm with you on that. I will sit and watch movies about the Earth having 150+ temperatures due to solar flares (thereby causing much havoc and destruction in a california city) or ice descending upon the whole world. Siegfried doesn;t get it. They're corny and predictable, but that's there charm. I do not go for monster horror though. "28 Days Later" is my edge, and I only watched it partly because of the actors and partly because at the time it came out I was reading a particular series of post-apocalyptic books and much of what we were discussing ont he email lists came out in that movie. But I do not have a desire to see "28 weeks Later", the sequel. The first is only periphally a zombie movie in my eye -- the 2nd is nothing but (or so I hear).
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 02:14 pm (UTC)
Oh, no - the second is actually rather good, and preserves some of the dreamy feel of the first. It's only towards the end that it gets violent. But you don't have to watch anything you don't want. :)
[info]shalandara wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 09:04 pm (UTC)
Hmm. I might add it to my netflix list and see it. The first has honor of being the only movie I have ever watched the commentary on. And that because I really wanted to hear about a scene at the end (which they didn't comment on at all -- go figure). Since I am not a watcher of zombie flicks I did not catch any of the references they were making, but it was neat to hear them talk about how they got permission to do certain shoots so that it looked like London was completely devoid of people.
[info]the_gersemi wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 02:34 pm (UTC)
It's probably because I was about 6 months pregnant when I saw "28 Weeks Later", but I cried. Numerous times.

I'm really looking forward to the sequel - yay, the virus made it to the mainland!
[info]courtney_d_h wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 03:13 pm (UTC)
What series of books was it? You are generating some interest over here, like I ever have time to rad anymore. (But, I don't miss the commute that LET me read!)

And yes, LOVE the junk science!!! Bring it on!
[info]shalandara wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 09:19 pm (UTC)
pardon for the long intrusion, but .....
Ok, the author is SM Stirling, who does alternative history/sci-fi stuff. In 1998 he began writing a trilogy of books about the island of Nantucket being sent back to 1250 BC. Some stupid parts, some really good parts. It predates the Eric Flint 1632 (or whatever year) stuff, and is far better than that anyway. So, after those 3 books, he wrote some others, including 2 stand alones -- Peshawar Lancers and Conquistador. Peshawar is interesting if you like the idea of the British Empire/Raj never falling but continuing on in India. Conquistador is a homage to Stargate, being a movie that Stirling loves. It is about a gate to an alternate Earth where Coloumbus never found America.

After he did those, he returned to his Island-verse books (the name given to his books on Nantucket) and posited about what happened to the rest of the world when Nantucket left, and why/how did it happen. It was a much darker thought than the Island-verse books. The first book was Dies the Fire, and it posits the end of civilization as we know it (due to outside influences) that reults in the death of maybe 90-95% of the people. The survivors are left in a pre-industrial state (with the knowledge of industrial stuff but not the ability to ever do them). It took me several times to read the first book -- some of the scenes are disturbing in their realism. The books are based in the Portland, Oregon area, and feature a bunch of SCAdians and Wiccans, and others. I actually had email conversations with him a few years ago, as he got some background info on the SCA (he is very interactive on his mailing list), as we pointed out that the SCA is not a homogonous blob and has disting personalities based on locale and such.

He has started a 2nd trilogy in this world (known as Ember-verse to some) set 25 years after the 1st.

A lot of people (like my husband) cannot get past his "junk science", of the artificial constraints that says no electricity/gunpowder/other stuff. I have seen his write up on the email list after a lengthy discussion with a physicist. Yes, it is not possible for us to do this -- but could someone else control the laws of physics in a certain area? Maybe. That is his point.

Movie/TV rights have evidently been discussed on these books. It would be weird to see them made -- especially the darker Dies the Fire. Much of the turmoil of 28 Days Later parallels alot of what he was writing (no zombies, but cannibals).
[info]isabelladangelo wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 03:19 pm (UTC)
I love wild "Weather-that-can't-truly-be-happening" movies.. and other disaster flicks.

Which is why Mom now refuses to watch those types of movies and 24 with me anymore.... I point out "Oh, that can't really happen because of such and such" and she hates it. :-) I actually get very frustrated with 24 but I watch it just to laugh and the nonsense...

The one actually halfway decent disaster flick in terms of science to back is up is Volcano; the one with Tommy Lee Jones? Although I doubt that using the drains would work but everything up to that point is pretty spot on...
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 04:08 pm (UTC)
I remember the day after I watched 10.5 (TV miniseries) (recapped on my website in Le Monde), I was listening to two geologists on the radio laughing themselves sick over the bad science. It was a very entertaining half hour. :)
[info]shalandara wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 09:01 pm (UTC)
But ..... I saw a Discovery(?) special on linked earthquakes, in which they were tracking earthquakes along a major fault line. Seems that they can go off in chains -- but not as quickly as that miniseries would indicate. Like decades apart. The fault line they were studying basically ends at Istanbul, so they are thinking a major one will hit there again soonish (at least geologically speaking).
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 19th, 2007 06:56 pm (UTC)
They can go off in chains, buyt they can't turn corners. That was a big sticking point. :) It's like Day after Tomorrow - things happen, but tend to happen slowly. There are several fault lines that bode really bad things if they go off, but the biggest problem is the destruction of pieces of coastline, which will cause mega-tsunamis as they displace the water. A spectacular American example if off the coast of (I think) Newfoundland, where waves reached a height of 200 feet or so. Bad stuff.

But turning corners? No.
[info]isabelladangelo wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 01:12 pm (UTC)
First to Uncle Ned:
"You know, if you ever came with me to an event, you don't have to wear a peascod belly but you might want to think about a girdle..."

I like even the micro-world collapsing (The Net, Donnie Brasco, Nick of Time) but when the macro-world gets destroyed they do tend to have more explosions. But then again, I watch Steven Seagull and Jean-Claude Van Dame movies just to eat popcorn and laugh. It's fun.
[info]sileas_1 wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 01:54 pm (UTC)
For me it's Nosferatu. The original silent movie about Dracula is the best. After Drac, I too am really loving the apocalypse type movies with all the possibilities. As long as the cats are not zombies, I'm good with solitude. (and a good movie collection, books, etc. and all the electricity needed to power up the toys.
[info]dreadpiratekurt wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 02:28 pm (UTC)
Being that I hate this time of year, I also enjoy watching humanity suffer with as many explosions as possible. I actually watched and *liked* Stephen King's The Stand mini-series (don't know how much of the bottle of Filipino rum - and pile of drunken Navy buddies trapped inside the barracks due to a typhoon in Guam - was affecting my delight).

If only there was a Post-Apocalyptic reenactment society, because I would totally work that roughly knitted sweater and random leather strapping.

[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 04:12 pm (UTC)
I have a jones for the outfit Milla Jovovich was wearing in Resident Evil: Extinction. Tasty.
[info]dreadpiratekurt wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 04:13 pm (UTC)
I have a jones for Milla Jovovich. Rawr.

I need to see that still. *makes note*
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 05:06 pm (UTC)
Here you go.
[info]xntryk wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 04:41 pm (UTC)
I re-read The Stand about once every five years... full length, 1700 page version. Something about the eerie end of humanity that just draws my interet.

Can't bring myself to watch the mini-series. I have pictures in my head of how this stuff is s'posed to look, dammit!

And if you liked The Stand, check out the Gunslinger books. Also eerie.
[info]lorebubeck wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 08:35 pm (UTC)
Gunslinger books. Bizarre.
[info]dreadbaron wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 07:06 pm (UTC)
Sweet! You got a rabbit zombie!
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 19th, 2007 06:57 pm (UTC)
It is gankable, as are any of my icons that don't have a restriction on them (which is none at the moment). :) Have a zombie rabbit of your own!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 09:55 pm (UTC)
If you go to the Aliens vs Predator -Requiem site (www.avp-r.com) you can have fun putting face huggers on pics of all your friends.

Enjoy the zombie goodness of the Season!

Course now I have a craving to turn "A Christmas Story" into "A Zombie Christmas Story", where Ralphie is forced to defend himself against his family with only his trusty "Red Ryder" B-B gun.

--C
[info]ccunning wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 09:56 pm (UTC)
If you go to the Aliens vs Predator -Requiem site (www.avp-r.com) you can have fun putting face huggers on pics of all your friends.

Enjoy the zombie goodness of the Season!

Course now I have a craving to turn "A Christmas Story" into "A Zombie Christmas Story", where Ralphie is forced to defend himself against his family with only his trusty "Red Ryder" B-B gun.

--C
[info]grian_ruadh wrote:
Dec. 18th, 2007 10:09 pm (UTC)
*heeheeheehee*

That icon set me off into a fit of giggles. :D

What's that old saying about zombie attacks? You don't have to run fastest to get away just faster than the guy next to you. >:)
[info]firehauke wrote:
Dec. 19th, 2007 01:09 am (UTC)
Ok, I don't care for zombie movies - but I do like apocalypse stories - like the disaster stuff put out by History Channel, Discovery, TLC, etc. I will watch those.

I'm intelligent enough to recognize the fake science in movies like 10.5. If only in correlation to what I know of California and it's quake history.

So, yeah, the 'what if' stories on Nature wrecking havoc one day (soon) get me purring in delight - movies, not so much.

Though I like to be entertained when I see a movie.
[info]attack_laurel wrote:
Dec. 19th, 2007 06:58 pm (UTC)
I love the "Perfect Disaster" series. :)
( 35 brains — Leave a chunk of brain! )

Latest Month

May 2012
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com